|
The full text of the decision, which can be viewed at the
following web address
http://vcat.vic.gov.au, (click on the link “what’s new”) provides
detail in regard to the law, interpretation, the application of legal
principles, legislative history, rationale of the Female Participation
Regulation and substantial evidence in regard to the strength, stamina
and physique of boys and girls, all of which makes interesting
reading. For this article however, we will include only the
conclusions of Justice Stuart Morris, quoting directly from the full
text of the decision.
CONCLUSIONS
“I find that it was unlawful for the football associations to
exclude girls from the MSJFL Australian Rules competition for those
under 14 on 1 January 2003. But I also find that it was lawful for
the football associations to exclude girls from the MSJFL Australian
Rules competition for those under 15 on 1 January 2003. I make these
findings because the relative differences between the strength,
stamina and physique of boys and girls has not been shown to be
sufficiently significant to be relevant in the participation in an
Australian Rules football competition for under 14 year olds. But the
relative differences have been shown to be sufficiently significant to
be relevant to participation in an Australian Rules football
competition for under 15 year olds.”
“I wish to make it clear that I am not giving my endorsement
to a rule which excludes girls from under 15 football. Rather my
decision is that it is lawful for a football association to adopt and
apply such a rule. For my part, the decision as to whether girls play
under 15 or, even, under 16 football should be left to the girls
themselves. Not only is this consistent with notions of free choice,
but also it can be
achieved without disadvantaging boys.
The issue of girls playing football with boys does not have a
direct parallel in boys playing netball with girls. In the former case
allowing girls to play will not provide boys with unfair competition,
thereby inhibiting the participation of boys.
|
|
But
the converse is true in the case of boys playing netball with girls.”
“There is another factor which I believe is relevant. As I
have illustrated by reference to the Grimmer study, boys over 13 who
play football are typically stronger and fitter than boys of that age
generally. There is an element of self selection at work. When it
comes to girls playing Australian Rules football the same process of
self selection is likely to occur; but to an even greater degree. This
means that the girls who will typically wish to play Australian Rules
football in the under 15 and under 16 competitions will be those with a
physique, strength or stamina at the upper end of the range for girls of
that age. They are also likely to be relatively highly skilled in the
playing of football. A wise policy will be one which takes the self
selection factor into account.”
“There is also a strong case for sporting associations to advance equal
opportunity by allowing smaller or physically weaker players to choose
to play in a younger age group. Such an approach is consistent with all
the expert evidence given in this case. It reflects the fact that there
is a huge variation in physique within each sex at a particular age. It
also reflects the fact that, especially during the period of 10 to 16
years, people do not grow at the same rate. In some New South Wales
schools there is a rule that a player can weigh down to a younger age
group in Rugby if they are more than one standard deviation below the
mean for their age group. I have no doubt that this sort of rule
promotes equal opportunity. In Australian Rules football, the rule
might be that a player can choose to play in a younger age group for the
season if the player’s height and weight are more than one standard
deviation below the means for their age group at a
fixed date at the commencement of the season.
In under 13 and
under 14 competitions the rule might be relaxed in relation to the
weight of girls to better reflect relative lean body mass.”
Continued....
|