Edition 08/2002
Implementing
Risk Management Strategies to Limit Exposure to Liability
Prior
to looking at risk management strategies that will limit the exposure
to liability it is necessary to have some knowledge of the laws
relating to liability. The two sections of law to look to are Common Law and Statute
Law.
Common
law is that section of law that evolved through custom and public
opinion over the centuries. It
is the law of precedent, being constructed on decisions of the Courts
in disputes brought before them.
Common law is continually developed and refined as new points
of law come before the Courts and are decided by them.
The decision of any Court on a question of law is binding on
all Courts of lesser authority, unless and until a Court of equal or
greater authority gives a different decision on the same question.
As
the Common Law is derived from the judicial settlements of disputes
between members of the community, it is accordingly the Common Law
that determines the rights and responsibilities among people.
It governs the duties that each person in the community owes to
his fellows and the rights of his fellows against him if he should
fail to fulfill his duties.
Statute
Law is the “written law” of the land.
It is regulation enacted by parliament to clarify, codify or
modify the Common Law and to control the conduct of members of the
community for the good of the community.
Parliament gives legal force to the wishes of the people of the
day via Statute Law. Where
Statute Law conflicts with the Common Law, the Statute prevails.
However Statutes may be repealed or varied by parliament but
the Common Law cannot. When
a Statute is repealed it no longer has any effect and the Common Law
immediately becomes the relevant law in respect of those matters to
which the Statute referred.
Therefore,
when pursuing strategies to limit exposure to liability it is
necessary to address liabilities emanating from Common Law and
liabilities emanating from Statute Law.
|
|
This
requires knowledge in not only the principles of Duty of Care and
Negligence, but also in regard to what Legislation may be relevant to
your organisation and the compliance requirements of such legislation.
The
purpose of this paper is not to look at the theoretical aspects of
risk management. Some
would suggest that there is no shortage of risk management theory, but
rather a shortage of practical advice on what measures can be taken to
minimise the likelihood and/or consequence of incidents that can lead
to liability. But first,
we do need to look at administration aspects.
An
important point to make is that risk management should not be seen as
separate to quality management – it is in fact simply a part of a
quality management system. The
risk management context needs to be integrated into the business plan,
aims and objectives of the organisation and become a part of everyday
practices. Risk
management is not rocket science, but rather the application of common
sense practices. Most
sport and recreation organisations would have been using risk
management principles for years; what are likely to be missing are a
systematic approach and a degree of discipline.
Documentation is an important component of a risk management
program and it is often this area where organisations have significant
room for improvement.
With
regard to the management function, the organisation should have a
documented Safety and Risk Management system in place that identifies
hazards and evaluates and controls risks.
This system should include policies and procedures that
personnel and members are aware of, understand and use.
Safety and management of risk responsibilities should be
defined (e.g. in job descriptions) and the organisation’s Management
Committee should regularly include Safety and Risk Management on its
meeting agenda with details of those discussions being included in the
minutes of the meeting. The
organisation should have Safety and Risk Management as a portfolio
position, with the identity of this officer known to all members.
Continued
....
|